Chemical Reactions (Differential Equations)
S. F. Ellermeyer and L. L. Combs
This module was developed through the support of a grant from the
National Science Foundation (grant number DUE-9752555)
Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Units of Measurement and Notation
2 Rates of Reactions
2.1 The Rate Law
2.2 Example
2.3 Exercises
1 Introduction
The net chemical reaction that takes place when water (H2O) is formed
from hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) is
The notation used to describe this reaction indicates that two molecules of
hydrogen combine with one molecule of oxygen to form two molecules of water.
Chemists use this type of notation in describing any chemical reaction. For
example, the net reaction for the formation of nitrogen dioxide (N02)
from nitrous oxide (NO) and oxygen (O2) is
which indicates that two molecules of nitrous oxide combine with one molecule
of oxygen to form two molecules of nitrogen dioxide. The reaction (2)
is one of great practical interest in our modern world because it is the first
of a series of reactions that produce ``photochemical smog'' from nitrous
oxide that is emitted from the exhaust gasses of automobiles.
Another example of a chemical reaction is the decomposition of hydrogen
peroxide (H2O2) into water and oxygen. The net reaction for this is
Since reaction (3) is catalyzed by light, hydrogen peroxide left to
sit in a clear bottle would rather quickly turn into water and oxygen. It is
because of this reaction that hydrogen peroxide is usually sold in brown
(non-transparent) plastic bottles.
In general, any chemical reaction can be described by using a notation of the
form
where the symbols A and B stand for the reactants of the reaction
and the symbols C and D stand for the products of the reaction.
The constants a, b, c, and d, which indicate the proportions in which
the reactants combine and the products are formed, are called
stoichiometric coefficients. Note that reactions (1) and
(2) both have the form
whereas, reaction (3) has the form
Unfortunately, stoichiometric descriptions of reactions such as (4)
do not tell the whole story. They only tell us the net result of a
reaction, without telling us how the reaction takes place. Most
chemical reactions actually have a mechanism involving the formation of
intermediate products. For example, the net reaction (2) for the
formation of nitrogen dioxide actually consists of three subreactions-all of
which occur simultaneously. A proposed mechanism for this reaction is
|
| |
|
|
® N2O2 (NO reacts with itself toform N2O2.) |
| |
|
®2NO (NO is reformed from someof the N2O2.) |
| |
| ®2NO2 (Some of the N2O2 reacts with O2 to form NO2.) |
|
| |
|
The intermediate product of dinitrogen dioxide (N2O2) does not appear
in the net reaction (2), but it is involved in the mechanism of the
reaction and, hence, a mathematical model of the reaction must take the
presence of N2O2 into account.
Because most chemical reactions that are important for a scientific
understanding of our world involve complex mechanisms, the development of
mathematical models of such reactions must be preceded by a substantial amount
of theoretical and experimental work in Chemistry aimed at gathering an
understanding of the mechanisms. In this module, we will restrict our
attention to the study of simple chemical reactions. Simple reactions
are reactions that do not involve complex mechanisms. The study of simple
reactions is a good starting point for learning some of the mathematics that
also pertains to the study of more complex reactions.
1.1 Units of Measurement and Notation
Since molecules are very small, quantities of molecules are measured in units
of moles. One mole of molecules is an Avogadro's number of
molecules. Avogadro's number is approximately 6.022×1023 . Hence,
for example, two moles is the same as 1.2044×1024 molecules.
Concentrations of molecules in a solution are measured in units of
molarities (M). One molarity is one mole of solute per liter of
solution. For example, a 2 M aqueous solution of sodium chloride (NaCl) is a
solution consisting of two moles of NaCl per each liter of solution. The
notation [A] denotes the concentration (in molarities) of a molecule A in
solution. Thus, if we write [NaCl] = 2 M, we mean that we have a solution with
a 2 M concentration of sodium chloride.
2 Rates of Reactions
Consider a simple chemical reaction of the form
This reaction involves the combination of two molecules of A and one
molecule of B to form one molecule of C. Because we are assuming that the
reaction is simple (that is, there are no intermediate steps), the
concentration of A decreases at twice the rate that the concentration of B decreases. Thus, we have
Also, the concentration of C increases at the same rate that the
concentration of B decreases, so
We can summarize the above two equations by writing
|
- |
1 2
|
|
d[ A] dt
|
= - |
d[ B] dt
|
= |
d[ C] dt
|
. |
|
In general, for a simple chemical reaction of the form
we have
|
- |
1 a
|
|
d[ A] dt
|
= - |
1 b
|
|
d[B] dt
|
= |
1 c
|
|
d[ C] dt
|
= |
1 d
|
|
d[ D] dt
|
|
|
and we define the rate of the reaction, v( t) , as
this common value. That is,
|
v = - |
1 a
|
|
d[ A] dt
|
= - |
1 b
|
|
d[B] dt
|
= |
1 c
|
|
d[ C] dt
|
= |
1 d
|
|
d[ D] dt
|
. |
|
Since the stoichiometric coefficients a, b, c, and d have no units,
v has units of M/time. We stress that the reaction rate v is a function of
time (t) because the reaction slows as the reactants are used up during the
course of the reaction. The units of measurement of time for a particular
reaction depend on the speed of the reaction. For a reaction that proceeds
very quickly, it might be appropriate to measure time in seconds or
milliseconds, whereas; for a very slow reaction such as the decay of some
radioactive compounds, time is measured in years.
2.1 The Rate Law
An important concept of chemistry that is crucial to the development of
mathematical models of chemical reactions is the Rate Law. For the
homogeneous reaction
with reaction rate v (as defined in the previous section), the Rate Law
gives the equation
Equation (5) is the framework on which mathematical models of chemical
reactions are built. In this equation, the constant of proportionality, k,
is called the rate constant of the reaction, and the constants
a and b are called the order of the reaction with
respect to the reactants A and B respectively. The constants k, a, and b can be determined only by actual chemical experiments. In
general, except possibly by coincidence, a and b are not related
to the stoichiometric coefficients a and b. Also, a and b
have no units of measurement and the units of k are determined by the
values of a and b in the following way: Recalling that v has
units of M/time and [ A] and [ B] both have
units of M, writing equation (5) in terms of units, we obtain
|
|
M time
|
= ( units of k) ·(M) a·( M) b = (units of k) ·Ma+b. |
|
From this we obtain,
|
units of k = |
M time·Ma+b
|
= M1-a-b·time-1. |
|
2.2 Example
As an example of the Rate Law, suppose that we have a reaction
which is first order with respect to A and B (that is, a = b = 1),
and has rate constant k = 0.02 M-1· min-1. Suppose also that
this reaction takes place in a container of fixed volume. The Rate Law then
gives us that the rate of this reaction is
Note that the stoichiometric coefficients play no role in the rate equation
(6). However, if we wish to rewrite the rate equation in terms of
the rate of consumption of one of the reactants (or the rate of formation of
one of the products), then the stoichiometric coefficients do play a role. For
example, using the fact that
we obtain the rate equation
|
- |
1 2
|
|
d[ A] dt
|
= 0.02[ A] [B] |
|
or equivalently
|
|
d[ A] dt
|
= -0.04[ A] [ B] |
| (7) |
for the rate of consumption of reactant A.
Likewise, we also obtain the following differential equations for the
concentrations of B, C, and D:
2.3 Exercises
Consider the simple bimolecular reaction
-
Given that reaction (8) is first order with respect
to A and B, and given that the rate constant for this reaction is
k = 0.025 M-1· sec-1, use the Rate Law to write down a system of
differential equations for [ A] and [ B] :
- System (9) that you derived in part 1 should have
infinitely many equilibrium points. Identify these equilibrium points and draw
a picture of the ( [ A] ,[ B] )
plane indicating where the equilibrium points are. Are all of these
equilibrium points relevant to the study of the chemical reaction? If not,
then which are the relevant ones? In terms of the chemical reaction, what is
the significance of each equilibrium point?
- Find the direction vector of system (9) at the point
( 6,4) . Draw this direction vector in the ( [A] ,[ B] ) plane. What does this direction vector
tell you about the chemical reaction? Find the direction vector at (4,2) and draw it. What does this vector tell you about the reaction?
What is similar about these two direction vectors and what is different about them?
- Produce a rough sketch of the direction field for system (9). (You can do this with a computer, but you may realize that you don't really
need a computer to do it.) What special feature does the direction field have
that makes it particularly easy to see what solution curves of system
(9) look like in the ( [ A] ,[ B]) plane?
-
Using your direction field, do a hand (or computer) sketch
of the solution of system (9) with initial condition ([ A] 0,[ B] 0) = ( 6,4) .
Which equilibrium point does this solution converge to as t®¥.
-
Sketch (by hand or computer) the [ A] vs. t
and [ B] vs. t graphs of the solution from exercise
5.
-
For the solution from exercise 5, find an equation
relating [ A] and [ B] .
-
Even though the model system (9) is nonlinear,
it is possible to find its exact solution analytically (a rarity for nonlinear
systems). Find the solution of system (9) with initial conditions
[ A] 0 = 6 M and [ B] 0 = 4 M. HINT:
The relation that you found between [ A] and [B] in exercise 7 can be used to decouple system
(9).
-
Discuss whether or not the exact solution you found in
part 8 is consistent with your earlier findings in parts
1-6. For example, what do you get when you use your exact
solution to compute limt®¥[ A] and
limt®¥[ B] ?
-
Time to generalize! Write an initial value problem that
models the reaction A+B® C which is assumed to be first order
with respect to both A and B and which has rate constant k > 0 and initial
reactant concentrations [ A] 0 and [ B] 0.
(You may assume that [ A] 0 ¹ [ B] 0. As
you proceed, you should see why the case [ A] 0 = [B] 0 must be handled separately.)
Solve the initial value problem you have written and discuss whether or not
your solution tells you what you expect it to about the chemical reaction. In
particular, discuss the long term behavior (as t®¥) of your
solution and discuss what role is played by the rate constant, k, and by the
initial concentrations, [ A] 0 and [ B] 0.
- Repeat as many as possible of the exercises in parts 1-9 using the reaction
with rate constant k > 0, but assuming that this reaction is first order with
respect to A (a = 1) and second order with respect to B
(b = 2). Discuss any difficulties that are encountered by assuming that
b = 2 (as opposed to b = 1).
File translated from TEX by TTH, version 2.34.
On 15 Jan 2000, 14:11.