
1)
DEEP LAKES WITH HIGH PHYTOPLANKTON PRODUCTIVITY
What are the
negative
effects associated with eutrophication?
What factors effect the levels of phytoplankton in lakes?

Lake Washington (Seattle) - wastewater divervisionInternal versus external loading
stats
Sewage from Seattle during first half of 1900's resulted in algal blooms by the mid 1950's (Oscillatoria rubescens). Sewage effluent diverted to Pugeut Sound (Pacific Ocean) eliminated 99% of nutrient inflow to the lake resulting in decline of phosphorus levels in the lake (from 70 to 16 µg/L), and increased water clarity , and declines in algal biomass (from 35 to 4 µg/L).
Lake Shagawa (MN) Wastewater treatment
Reduction in wastewater phosphorus did not result in major changes in chlorophyll levels. Why?
Can be estimated by calculating a phosphorus budget
What are the disadvantages?
Moses and Green Lakes in Washington State. The dilution water was low in nitrogen and phosphorus content relative to the lake. Flushing rates were 10X normal in Moses Lake and 3X in Green Lake. Improvement in quality (nutrients, algae, and transparency) was on the order of 50% in Moses Lake and even greater in Green Lake.Besides reducing phosphorus concentration, what other factor might result in phytoplankton decline?
What are the disadvantages?
http://www.co.clark.nv.us/Parks/Wetlands/Wetland's_Erosion_Control.htm
What are the disadvantages?
| aluminum sulfate salts (alum) | ----> | insoluble floc of aluminum hydroxide that bounds tightly to P regardless of oxygen concentration | ![]() |
Lafayette Reservoir, California
Sodium aluminate for soft water lakes.
Lime (CaCO3) may also improve
effectiveness
in some situations.
What are the disadvantages?
Artificial Circulation/Hypolimnetic aeration
![]()
Why might this work?
What are the disadvantages?
Why might this work?
What are the disadvantages?

What are the disadvantages?
Other chemical and biocides and selectively adapted strains of bacteria also used to reduce phytoplankton directly.
2)
SHALLOW WEED CHOKED LAKES

One
example of potentially
problematic aquatic macrophytes: Eurasian watermilfoil
(Myriophyllum spicatum)
Nutrient reduction does not necessily
lead
to macrophyte reduction and sometimes increases macrophytes. Why?
Sedimentation causing increased littoral zone may be the driving force in small lake eutrophication.

What are the disadvantages?

What are the disadvantages?
Addition of tripliod grass carp.
![]()
What are the disadvantages?
Lake Level Drawdown
Expose rooted plants to hot or freezing. Results variable
What are the disadvantages?

Controlling macrophytes have often increased phytoplankton. Why?
Many solutions to macrophytes create phytoplankton problems and vice-versa
SOLUTIONS THAT MAY ADDRESS BOTH PHYTOPLANKTON AND MACROPHYTE PROBLEMS
Conclusions:Sediment Removal
- deepens lake for macrophyte control
- removes internal P loads
- potentially removes toxic substances
What are the disadvantages?
Watershed protection
- stream buffers
- Best Mananagement Practices (BMP's)
- enforcment of silt fences, septic tank construction and maintence, sewer line maintence
What are the disadvantages?
Effectiveness
depends on funds available, risks willing to be taken, goals, and the
lake
system.
(from Soil & Water
Conservation
Society of Metro Halifax at
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Science/SWCS/lakerest.html)
Overall problems complex. Every lake is different and must understand the basic limnology to evalute the effectiveness of a possible treatment.